July 31, 2026 | The Product Manager’s Journal
The Take
A competitor spent this month copying the one sentence I use to describe my company. My first instinct was to defend the sentence. That was the wrong instinct.
For about eighteen months, I’ve had a clean line for what makes us different. Single origins over there, us over here with route-based blends. It fit on a slide. It won arguments. It was the first thing I said in every investor conversation. This month, a better-capitalized competitor launched a line of blends, and that sentence stopped being true.
Here’s the reflex I had to catch, and the one I watch other founders fall into. When someone copies your differentiator, you defend the differentiator. You re-argue why your version is better. You add an adjective. Ours are cultural routes, theirs are pantry classics, see, still different. Maybe that’s even true. But spending your energy defending the copied differentiator is how you miss the real signal.
The real signal is this: differentiation was never one thing. It’s a stack of them, and each has a price to copy. Some are cheap. A product line is cheap; anyone with a co-packer can ship a blend. Some are expensive. A relationship with a farmer takes years. A subscription base takes retention you can’t fake. A working piece of hardware takes a build. When a competitor copies you, they aren’t ending your differentiation. They’re telling you, for free, which one was always the shallow one.
So the move isn’t to defend the shallow differentiator. It’s to know already which are cheap and which are expensive, and to re-sequence what you lead with. What you say first should be the part that’s most expensive to copy, not the part that’s easiest to explain. I’d been leading with the easy one because it fits nicely on a slide. The competitor did me a favor by taking it from me.
Do the audit before someone forces it on you. Write down every leg of your differentiation. Next to each one, write how long a funded competitor would need to copy it. Anything under a quarter isn’t a moat; it’s a feature you happen to have first. Lead with the years, not the weeks.
If you’re building anything this quarter, that’s the reminder. The sentence that fits on a slide is usually the one a competitor can copy by next quarter. Better to know that before they prove it to you.
Spice Route Signal
The chip that made our packaging special is now being manufactured cheaply by the biggest label company on earth. That’s good news.
The largest label converter in the world spent this month industrializing the exact hardware our packaging is built on. Avery Dennison expanded its NFC line with flexible chips built on Pragmatic Semiconductor’s technology, the first large-scale run of flexible semiconductors into mass-market inlays. Thin enough for curved surfaces, priced for putting one on every item, and aimed squarely at authentication and traceability. A separate launch added tamper detection to the same stack. Vendor forecasts put NFC-enabled packaging around $6.35 billion in 2026, on the way to roughly $16 billion by 2034. Treat the exact figures as supplier marketing; the direction isn’t in dispute.
As a founder holding a box of NFC tags, it might seem like bad news. I believe my focus is on becoming simply ordinary.
It isn’t bad news. It’s the same lesson as The Take, arriving from a different direction. When the hardware was rare, having a tag was the differentiator. Now that the biggest converter on the planet is making tags cheap and everywhere, having a tag is worth nothing. What the tag opens is worth everything. A chip on a jar is table stakes now. A chip that resolves to a specific farmer, a specific batch, a specific harvest date is not, because that payload can’t be bought from a converter. It has to be built, and behind it there has to be a real relationship that makes the story true.
The commoditization of the chip is the best thing that could happen to a company whose advantage was never the chip. It quietly retires everyone whose entire pitch was the hardware. The clock it starts is simple: finish the experience behind the tap while “tap opens a story” is still novel, before the industry assumes it.
[Source: Avery Dennison NFC Connect expansion built on Pragmatic Semiconductor flexible chips, plus Pragmatic’s separate NFC Protect tamper-detection launch; NFC-packaging forecast ~$6.35B in 2026 to ~$16.27B by 2034, vendor-published and directional. Via Packaging Insights and Packaging Europe, July 2026.]
From the Trenches
I finally have a real shortlist and a thousand tags on my desk. I still don’t have the one thing the whole plan depends on: a tap that resolves.
Start with the honest progress. The developer search for the tap experience finally turned into a real selection process. I narrowed a hundred-plus proposals down to a short list, sent each person a clarifying question, and every one of them answered. One candidate who came to me off-platform got a full call and a scope of work; after sitting with it, I decided not to move forward and sent a note to that effect. Choosing who to reject is the work now, which is a better problem than the one I had two weeks ago.
The physical side is done and waiting. A thousand NFC tags arrived, inspected and correct, our fox logo printed on each one. They sit on the desk as inventory. And inventory is a kind of pressure. A box of tags that lead nowhere is just stickers.
Because the part that matters still isn’t live, the production tap doesn’t resolve yet. No contractor is hired, the interviews aren’t on the calendar, and the domain attach is a job I keep meaning to do myself rather than wait on a hire who doesn’t exist yet. This is the gap I keep writing down so it doesn’t sit another week: tags in hand, no working tap.
The co-packer chases are the other slow leak. Four keep-warm notes to potential partners have been drafted and unsent for the better part of a week, the kind of approve-and-send work that fits any light day and somehow never goes out. A sourcing lead from a trading house is sitting in the same state, a call held but the follow-up unwritten.
None of this photographs well. A full inbox of proposals feels like momentum. The tap that still returns nothing, the notes I haven’t sent: those don’t feel like anything. Which is exactly why they’re the list.
From the Rack
Nutmeg was once worth more than gold, protected by the only moat that mattered: nobody else could grow it. One smuggled seedling ended that forever.
Caribbean Sunset features nutmeg, which has the most cautionary business story among spices. For a stretch of history, it grew in exactly one place on earth, a small cluster of islands, and whoever controlled those islands controlled the entire world supply. The price was absurd, higher than gold by weight, and it stayed absurd because the moat looked permanent. You can’t compete with a spice you physically cannot grow. Then someone carried seedlings out, planted them somewhere else with the same warm soil, and a monopoly that had lasted generations was over in a growing season. Grate a little fresh nutmeg over rum and lime at the end of a hot day, and you understand why people once killed for it: warm, sweet, woody, a little smoky, the smell of somewhere the sun just went down. It’s still wonderful. It’s just no longer scarce.
Here’s the lesson in that seed. A moat built on exclusive access is only as durable as the access. The Dutch thought geography was forever. Geography is never forever; someone always finds the same soil, or invents a substitute, or carries out the one thing you were counting on nobody else having. If the only reason you win is that a competitor can’t reach your ingredient, your channel, or your data, then your whole business rests on a fence somebody is already climbing.
The durable version isn’t a fence. It’s what stays hard even after the access is gone: the relationships, the accumulated trust, the compounding data that a seedling can’t carry. Don’t build your company on being the only one who can reach something. Build it on being the one who does the most with it once everyone can.
On My Desk
7 Powers: The Foundations of Business Strategy by Hamilton Helmer. Again.
I put this book on the desk back in May, during the tariff week, and it’s back for a reason. Helmer’s test for whether something counts as a real power has two parts: benefit, meaning it improves your economics, and barrier, meaning a competitor can’t simply copy it. Most of what companies call a moat clears the first bar and fails the second.
What I wrote in May was that the barrier in this business isn’t the NFC chip, because anyone can buy a chip. The barrier is the provenance data that accumulates over years of direct-trade relationships.
I believed it when I wrote it. I hadn’t been tested on it. This month the industry ran the test twice, and both results pointed the same way. The largest label converter on earth started making the chip cheap and ubiquitous, which retires “we have a tag” as an answer. And a competitor shipped the product line I’d been using as my opening sentence, which retires that one too. Both were the legs I could have priced as cheap if I’d bothered to price them.
The barrier question reads differently now that a thousand tags are sitting on my desk. In May, the chip was an idea I could defend in the abstract; every barrier looks tall from a distance. Now the hardware is a physical object in a box, the experience behind it still doesn’t resolve, and the only part of the bet that’s still hard to copy is the part I haven’t finished building. It’s the same test, much less comfortable score.
Reread it when a competitor moves on you. The first read tells you what a power is. The second one, after someone’s actually taken a swing, tells you which of yours were real.
That’s the Rack
Thanks for reading Issue #18. I’m Dan Blizinski, founder of Trevean Spice and the person behind The Product Manager’s Journal, where I write about PM frameworks grounded in actually building things, not just theorizing about them.
New here? Grab the free Startup PM Toolkit. Five frameworks I actually use, not just talk about.
Which leg of your differentiation could a funded competitor copy by next quarter? Hit reply; I read every one.
The PM’s Spice Rack is published weekly on The Product Manager’s Journal and on LinkedIn. Subscribe to get it in your inbox.
Leave a Reply